🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.